Where the money goes, who sees it, and what to do next.
A connected report across three Halo Implant Group sites covering all six DentOps pillars —
from the first inbound lead to the final restoration, from the implant coordinator's call sheet
to the surgeon's day rate. The story neither a PMS nor a phone system can tell alone.
Reporting periodFeb 16 — May 16, 2026 (T90)
Trend backdropMay 2025 — May 2026
Sites coveredMayfair · Brighton · Leeds
Practice profilePrivate implant · UK
Surgeon FTE5.5
Implants placed (T90)313
Annualised revenue£12.5M
01 The Picture
Five things you cannot see in any one system on its own.
Each of the five paragraphs below joins two or more of the six pillars of the practice —
a story that the CRM, phone system, PMS, finance ledger, payroll spreadsheet, or hygiene book
cannot tell alone. Together they explain £1.05M of revenue Halo is leaving on the table
in the next 90 days.
£1.05M
RECOVERABLE REVENUE — T90 ACTIONABLE
Stalled case plans, missed callbacks, lapsed maintenance recalls, restoration billing gaps,
coordinator drop-offs and avoidable lab remakes — ranked by difficulty in Tab 09.
1
The Coordinator Bottleneck. Halo Brighton brought in
386 implant leads across the last 90 days — the highest of any site —
but converted only 56% to a booked consult.
The CRM shows the leads. The phone system shows
22 hours of unanswered inbound on Tuesday afternoons.
The payroll record shows one coordinator covering both consult intake and treatment-plan follow-up.
Adding a second coordinator at Brighton (£42K/yr fully loaded) plausibly recovers £186K of stalled lead value. See Tab 06.
2
Halo Leeds is losing money per surgical hour.
The PMS shows surgical utilisation at 51%.
The finance ledger shows revenue per surgical hour at £284.
Payroll shows the principal's fully-loaded cost per surgical hour at
£312.
Every surgical hour at Leeds currently destroys £28 of margin.
This is invisible from a P&L because the locum income covers the gap. See Tab 07.
3
The full-arch story is the group's real engine.
Across the group, 28 full-arch cases T90 generated
£782K of revenue —
24% of all cash collected from 8% of cases.
But lab remake rate at Brighton (4.2%) is double the group average,
and surgeon time per full-arch at Brighton is
38 minutes longer than at Mayfair.
Bringing Brighton in line is worth £104K/yr in margin. See Tab 08.
4
The implant maintenance book is the moat — and it's leaking.
1,847 patients are post-restoration across the group. Implant maintenance recall compliance is
86% at Mayfair, 71% at Brighton,
and 38% at Leeds.
Every lapsed maintenance patient is on average £240/yr of high-margin revenue lost forever,
and 4.2× more likely to develop peri-implantitis — a complication that costs an average of £1,840 to manage.
Reactivating Leeds's 304 lapsed patients is worth £73K/yr recurring. See Tab 10.
5
£127K of completed restorations are unbilled.
Clinical records show 38 restorations delivered in March and April that have no final invoice raised in the finance ledger
— the second-stage billing is falling through the gap between the surgeon's notes and the front desk's checkout flow.
This is one workflow change, executable in 7 days, worth £127K of immediate cash with no new clinical work. See Tab 09.
Plain English
Why a "connected report" matters for an implant clinic specifically.
An implant patient is not a hygiene patient. The average implant case at Halo is worth £6,400
and runs for 8–14 months from first call to final restoration. That patient touches the practice
through the CRM (the inbound enquiry), the phone system (every call back and reschedule), the PMS
(every CBCT, consult, surgery and review), the lab (impressions and crowns), the finance ledger
(deposit, stage payments, final invoice, finance company), the surgeon's day rate (payroll), and
eventually the maintenance recall book (lifetime value).
Any one system tells you a partial truth. The PMS shows surgeries done. The phone system shows
calls answered. Neither one can tell you whether the £186K of stalled Brighton leads are stalled
because the leads are bad, the coordinator is overloaded, the surgeon's diary is full, or the finance
package keeps being declined. The connected report is the only place that question has an answer.
Think of it like an airline. The check-in counter, the gate, the bag belt and the cabin crew
each have a screen with their slice. But it's only when you put them together that you discover the flight
is leaving with 14 empty seats while 22 passengers were turned away at re-booking because nobody could see
both screens at once. That's what this report does for Halo.
02 Headline Numbers
The trailing-90-day picture across all six pillars.
Group-level metrics for Feb 16 – May 16, 2026. Each tile is colour-coded by which DentOps pillar
owns the number. Site-level breakdown follows in Tab 04.
Growth
Inbound implant leads
1,847
+18.4% vs prior 90 days
Operations
Call answer rate (group)
79.2%
Leeds at 51% drags average
Growth
Consult bookings
1,082
58.6% lead-to-consult
Clinical
Consults completed
994
FTA rate 8.1%
Clinical
Case plans accepted
426
62.6% acceptance rate
Clinical
Implants placed
313
28 full-arch · 71 multi-tooth · 214 single
Operations
Surgical chair utilisation
75.4%
Range 51%–91% across sites
Finance
Cash collected (T90)
£3.35M
+12.1% vs prior 90 days
Finance
Revenue per surgical hour (group)
£487
Mayfair £610, Brighton £487, Leeds £284
Finance
Avg case value (all-implant)
£6,420
Full-arch £28K avg; single-tooth £3,180 avg
Patients
Maintenance recall compliance
71.2%
Leeds at 38% — clinical risk
Payroll
Surgeon payroll % of revenue
25.3%
Target 22–26%
Payroll
Lab + materials % of revenue
15.5%
Brighton at 18.2% drags average
Growth
Open case plans >30 days
142
£412K stalled value
Operations
Missed inbound callbacks (T90)
428
63% are at Leeds
All Pillars
Recoverable revenue (T90 actionable)
£1.05M
Stacked by source in Tab 09
Revenue trend — trailing 12 months
Monthly cash collected, group total
FINANCE
Implants placed — trailing 12 months
Monthly count by complexity tier
CLINICAL
Lead source mix (T90)
Where the 1,847 inbound leads came from
GROWTH
Group P&L slice (T90)
Revenue · lab · surgeon payroll · nurse + support · overhead · net
FINANCE + PAYROLL
Top-line vs gross margin · per implant indication · T90
The single most important breakdown for an implant practice — which case types are actually generating the margin.
Full-arch + All-on-X = 8.3% of cases but 35% of total gross margin.
The CEO's question: are we shifting the mix toward the high-margin indications fast enough?
Indication
Cases T90
Avg case £
Top-line £
Gross margin £
Margin %
% of total margin
Single-tooth implant
223
£3,180
£709K
£368K
52%
31%
Multi-tooth (2–4 implants)
62
£8,400
£521K
£271K
52%
23%
Full-arch single jaw
18
£27,300
£491K
£276K
56%
23%
All-on-X immediate-load
8
£32,000
£256K
£148K
★ 58%
12%
Zygomatic rescue
2
£42,000
£84K
£41K
49%
3%
Adjunct procedure premium (overlay on 39 of the base cases · bone graft / sinus lift)
+39
£4,800
£187K
£92K
49%
8%
Implant case total (base 313 cases · adjunct as overlay · excludes maintenance + recall)
Eight things the group is doing right — credited to the people doing them.
Before we get to the leaks. The basics across the group are largely sound,
which is why the recoverable revenue figures in Tab 09 are large rather than terrifying.
• WIN 01 · OPERATIONS · MAYFAIR
Mayfair surgical utilisation is best-in-class.
91%
Across 12 surgical chairs at Mayfair, 91% of available surgical minutes are billed. Industry benchmark for premium implant practices is 78–82%.
Credit goes to: Mayfair diary management & Dr. Whitfield's 6-week rolling planning rhythm.
• WIN 02 · CLINICAL
Group complication rate is below the published implant benchmark.
0.9%
Across 313 implants placed in the trailing 90 days, 3 cases recorded a complication requiring intervention. Industry published rate for guided implant surgery is 1.5–2.2%.
Credit goes to: surgical protocols enforced across all 3 sites, mandatory CBCT pre-op, guided surgery for 78% of cases.
• WIN 03 · GROWTH · MAYFAIR
Mayfair's case acceptance rate at the consult is exceptional.
71%
71% of presented case plans at Mayfair convert to a paid deposit. Brighton is at 56%, Leeds at 41%. Mayfair's "same-day deposit" protocol works.
Credit goes to: Mayfair coordinator Sophie Bennett & the integrated finance options presented at consult.
• WIN 04 · PATIENTS · MAYFAIR
Mayfair maintenance recall compliance is best-practice.
86%
86% of post-restoration patients at Mayfair attend their 6-month implant maintenance review. The bonded crown lifetime extends by 4–6 years at this compliance level.
Credit goes to: hygienist Joanna Park's pre-book-at-checkout flow.
• WIN 05 · FINANCE
Deposit collection rate held at >90% across all three sites.
90.8%
426 case plans accepted in T90 generated 387 paid deposits. Only 39 cases stalled at the deposit step — well within best-practice tolerance.
Credit goes to: integrated finance providers offering 0% finance up to £12K; deposit-at-consult workflow.
• WIN 06 · CLINICAL · FULL-ARCH
Full-arch is now the group's highest-margin product.
62% margin
28 full-arch cases T90 generated £782K revenue at 62% gross margin after lab, materials and surgeon time. Single-tooth implants average 48% margin.
Credit goes to: Dr. Whitfield's pivot to All-on-4 protocols in Q4 2025; Brighton picking up the playbook.
• WIN 07 · OPERATIONS · MAYFAIR
Same-day-conversion-at-consult at Mayfair is exceptional.
64%
64% of consults at Mayfair walk out with a surgery date in the diary on the same day. This collapses the lead-to-surgery cycle from 47 days (industry avg) to 19 days at Mayfair.
Credit goes to: Mayfair's integrated consult workflow (clinical findings → CBCT review → plan → deposit → date) in one visit.
• WIN 08 · LEADERSHIP
Halo invested in Leeds early — before the numbers are this report.
2 yrs
Leeds opened May 2024. The leadership knew Q1 ramp would be slow. The numbers below are not failure — they are diagnosis. The investment is recoverable on the 90-day plan in Tab 12.
Credit goes to: the call to open Leeds at all, in a market that has no other premium implant clinic within a 35-mile radius.
04 Three Sites
Three sites. Three completely different management conversations.
The group P&L hides three radically different operational stories. The same KPI set that
looks healthy at group level reveals a flagship, a growth site fighting a coordinator bottleneck,
and a site that needs urgent action this quarter.
Mayfair is operating near the ceiling of what a 6-chair central London implant clinic can do.
The 90-day move at Mayfair is not to push utilisation higher (it's already 91%) but to
capture more value per chair-hour by pushing the full-arch share of case mix.
Brighton has the demand (386 leads, biggest in the group) but is choking on the operational
capacity to convert it. The diagnosis is concrete: a single overloaded coordinator, a lab supplier
with an above-average remake rate, and full-arch cases taking 38 minutes longer than at Mayfair.
All three are fixable. See Tabs 06, 08.
Leeds needs urgent intervention. The site is two years old, the surgeon is good, but
every single connected KPI is below target — call answer, case acceptance, surgical
utilisation, maintenance recall, revenue per hour. The good news: each one has a defined 30/60/90-day
action with a known revenue uplift. See Tab 12, P1 column.
Think of the three sites as a 50-meter swimming pool, a leaky garden hose, and a closed tap.
Mayfair is the pool — full, working hard, but bounded by physical size. Brighton is the hose —
plenty of water pressure (leads) but losing flow through a dozen small holes. Leeds is the tap —
the water is sitting on the supply side, but very little is making it through to the bucket. Each
needs a completely different fix.
05 Lead → Restoration
One implant patient. Ten steps. Six systems underneath.
Every patient walks this same 10-step journey from inbound enquiry to final restoration delivery.
At each step, a different DentOps pillar owns the data. The drop-off at each step is shown below —
because if you don't see the drop-off, you can't fix the leak.
Implant patient journey funnel
Group total · trailing 90 days · Feb 16 — May 16, 2026
Booked into maintenance recall PatientsFirst 6-month implant maintenance review in the diary
22712.3%−85 not booked
!
THE BIGGEST SINGLE LEAK
From 681 plans presented to 426 plans accepted — the practice loses 255 patients in this single step.
That is 14% of every inbound lead, and at the group's £6,420 average case value, it represents
£1.64M of treatment value that walked out of the consult room and never came back.
Mayfair converts 71% at this step. Leeds converts 41%. Closing the 30-point gap at Leeds alone is worth
£185K–£240K. See Tab 06 for the coordinator-bottleneck diagnosis.
Where the systems hand off
Six pillars, ten steps, one patient.
The journey above is colour-coded by which pillar owns each step. The handoffs are where things go wrong:
Step 2 → 3 (Ops → Growth): a call gets answered but the coordinator doesn't book a consult. 384 leads vanish here. Step 5 → 6 (Clinical → Growth): a CBCT is taken but a case plan never goes back to the patient. 125 leads vanish here. Step 7 → 8 (Growth → Finance): patient says yes but the deposit doesn't land. 39 leads vanish here. Step 10 → 11 (Clinical → Patients): restoration delivered but no maintenance recall booked. 85 patients exit unprotected.
Each of these handoffs is between two pillars. Each one is invisible if you only look at one
pillar's dashboard. This is the case for DentOps.
06 Coordinator Bottleneck
The Brighton story: when you have more demand than capacity to convert it.
Halo Brighton brought in 386 implant leads this quarter — the most of any site in the group.
It converted only 56%. Three pillars together explain why, and one hire fixes it.
GROWTH · CRM
Brighton has the largest lead pipeline in the group.
Inbound leads (T90)386
% from paid (Meta + Google)64%
Marketing spend (T90)£38,420
Cost per lead£99.50
Consults booked from leads216
Lead → consult conversion56%
Stalled leads >14 days no contact170
OPERATIONS · TELEPHONY
The phone system shows when the leads bleed out.
Inbound implant calls (T90)681
Call answer rate81%
Missed calls (T90)130
Missed call hours, weekly avg8.4 hrs
Worst hour: Tue 2–4pm42% answer
Worst hour: Thu 11–1pm51% answer
Median callback time18.5 hrs
PAYROLL · STAFFING
The payroll record explains both numbers.
Coordinator FTE at Brighton1.0
Coordinators at Mayfair (smaller pipeline)2.0
Coordinator cost (Brighton, T90)£10,500
Coordinator workload — consults216 consults
Coordinator workload — plan follow-ups204 open plans
Coordinator workload — deposit chasing62 stages
Total open work-items per coord482
CLINICAL · THE COST OF NOT FIXING
Brighton's surgeons are sitting idle while leads stall.
Surgical chair utilisation78%
Idle surgical hours per week (group avg)28 hrs
Brighton idle hours per week21 hrs
Stalled case plan value >30d£186,400
Lapsed lead value (no-contact >14d)£144,800
Marketing £ per converted patient£178
Marketing £ per captured case£317
Σ
THE CONNECTED DIAGNOSIS
Brighton is paying £38K/quarter for paid leads, generating
681 inbound calls, missing 130 of them (mostly Tue and Thu afternoons),
letting 170 leads go cold and 204 case plans stall >30 days, all because
one coordinator is doing the work of two. The surgeons are sitting idle 21 hours a week
waiting for the diary to fill. The fix is £42K/yr fully loaded for a second coordinator.
The recovered revenue at 50% conversion of the stalled pipeline is £186K in the first 90 days alone.
Brighton — call answer rate heatmap by hour and day
Last 90 days · darker = lower answer rate
OPERATIONS
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
9–11am
88%
85%
86%
78%
81%
11am–1pm
79%
68%
76%
51%
72%
1–2pm
61%
54%
63%
58%
66%
2–4pm
76%
42%
71%
58%
64%
4–6pm
82%
74%
84%
73%
85%
The two worst cells (Tue 2–4pm at 42%, Thu 11–1pm at 51%) are when the single coordinator is in back-to-back consults.
These two slots alone account for 68 of the 130 missed calls T90.
A second coordinator covers exactly these gaps.
07 Surgical Hour Economics
Revenue per surgical hour − fully-loaded cost per surgical hour = margin per surgeon per site.
The single most important number for an implant practice: what is each surgeon's hour
actually worth? Three pillars (Ops, Finance, Payroll) must join cleanly to compute it.
Halo Leeds is currently negative.
Surgeon · Site
Role
Surg hrs T90 OPS
Util %
Revenue generated FIN
Rev / surg hr
Fully-loaded cost / hr PAY
Margin / hr
Dr. James Whitfield Mayfair · Principal · Full-arch lead
Principal
1,124
93%
£0.94M
£836
£298
+£538
Dr. Priya Mehta Mayfair · Single + multi-tooth
Associate
1,058
88%
£0.80M
£756
£262
+£494
Dr. Marcus Lin Brighton · Principal
Principal
1,012
82%
£0.61M
£603
£285
+£318
Dr. Sarah Okafor Brighton · Growing single + multi
Associate
894
74%
£0.51M
£570
£241
+£329
Dr. Aleksi Korhonen Leeds · Principal · Single only
Principal
832
53%
£0.28M
£337
£365
−£28
Locum (Leeds rota) Leeds · 0.5 FTE
Locum
386
48%
£0.21M
£544
£420
+£124
Group total
5.5 FTE
5,306
75%
£3.35M
£631
£302
+£329
−£28/hr
DR. KORHONEN AT LEEDS · MARGIN PER SURGICAL HOUR
Every surgical hour at Halo Leeds with the principal surgeon currently destroys £28 of margin.
Across 832 hours T90 that is £23,300 of operational loss, masked at group level by
Mayfair's profitability. The lever is not the surgeon's skill (it's fine) —
the lever is utilisation. Pushing Leeds from 53% to 70% util alone moves margin per hour from −£28 to +£138.
What "fully-loaded cost per hour" means
The cost number that nobody computes — until it's too late.
Fully-loaded cost per surgical hour = base salary or day rate + employer's NI + pension + allocated overhead
(nurse cost, room cost, sterilisation, supplies, software) + employer's portion of insurance · divided by
actually-billed surgical hours.
This is the true denominator for surgeon profitability. A surgeon on a £250K package, with full
overhead allocation of £180K (typical for implant practice), needs to deliver £430K of clinical
revenue just to break even. At 1,500 billed surgical hours/yr that is £287/hr break-even.
At 900 hours (53% util), break-even jumps to £478/hr.
It's the airline empty-seat problem. The plane's flying anyway. The crew, the fuel,
the gate fees — all sunk. Every unsold seat is pure margin loss. A surgical chair is the same.
The cost is paid whether the chair is occupied or not. Halo Leeds is currently flying with half-empty seats.
08 Full-Arch Unit Economics
The All-on-4 case — what it really costs, what it really earns, and why Brighton is leaking margin.
Five pillars must join cleanly to give you the answer: Clinical (case complexity), Finance (revenue and
material cost), Payroll (surgeon and nurse time), Operations (room time), Patients (LTV from
long-term maintenance). Below: the same case modelled at all three sites.
Model case: All-on-4 single-arch, immediate-load, guided surgery, conventional finance package
Avg case value at Halo · T90 actual deliveries · numbers below are the group average; site-specific variances follow
Revenue components
Consultation + CBCT fee£420
Surgical placement (4 implants)£14,800
Provisional restoration£3,200
Definitive zirconia bridge£8,400
Healing & review appts£480
Total case revenue£27,300
Direct costs CLIPAY
Implant fixtures (4 × Straumann)£1,840
Abutments & components£640
Provisional lab fee£780
Definitive zirconia bridge lab£3,420
Surgeon time (8.5 hrs × loaded rate)£2,565
Surgical nurse + assistant time£640
Total direct cost£9,885
Indirect & opportunity
Allocated overhead (room, sterilisation)£980
Coordinator + admin time£340
Finance company fee (2.4% on £18k)£432
Marketing attributable cost£280
Allowance for lab remake (1.8% group)£76
Total indirect£2,108
Case revenue
£27,300
Total cost
£11,993
Net margin / case
£15,307
Margin %
56.1%
Same case, three sites.
Component
Mayfair
Brighton
Leeds
Group avg
Case revenue (avg actual)
£28,420
£26,180
£24,800
£27,300
Surgeon time · hours per case
8.2
8.9
9.4
8.5
Surgeon cost per case
£2,444
£2,537
£3,431
£2,565
Lab cost per case
£4,020
£4,820
£4,200
£4,200
Lab remake rate
1.2%
4.2%
2.4%
2.3%
Total cost per case
£11,224
£12,815
£12,910
£11,993
Net margin per case
£17,196
£13,365
£11,890
£15,307
Margin %
60.5%
51.0%
47.9%
56.1%
Full-arch cases T90
18
9
1
28
Full-arch margin T90
£309,528
£120,285
£11,890
£441,703
Δ
BRIGHTON IS LEAKING £3,831 OF MARGIN PER FULL-ARCH CASE
Brighton runs 42 minutes longer per case (surgeon time leakage), spends £800 more on lab (different supplier),
and remakes 4.2% of bridges vs. Mayfair's 1.2%. At Brighton's current full-arch run rate of 36 cases/yr,
bringing those three lines in line with Mayfair recovers £138K of annual margin.
Lab supplier review, surgical protocol benchmarking against Whitfield's technique, and a 6-week
mentoring pair-up are the three plays in the 90-day plan.
09 Recoverable Revenue
£1.05M sitting in the gaps between systems — ranked by how hard it is to recover.
Every recoverable line below comes from a cross-pillar query. None of them are visible from a single
system's dashboard. All of them have a named patient list behind the number (Tab 10 onward).
Ordered easiest to hardest in the next 90 days.
Recoverable revenue stack · T90 actionable
£1,052,400
Unbilled completed restorations CLIFIN38 cases delivered Mar–Apr with no final invoice raised
£127,40012.1% · easy
Stalled case plans >30 days (Brighton-dominant) GROPAY204 plans presented but not yet accepted/declined; coordinator follow-up
Stage payments not chased FINCLIMulti-stage cases with 2nd/3rd payments uncollected past due date
£27,4002.6% · easy
How to read the stack
Every line traces to a named patient list. Nothing is theoretical.
The £127K of unbilled restorations is 38 specific patients whose final crowns were
cemented in March or April. Their clinical notes show the procedure done; the finance ledger has no
matching invoice. Receptionists at all three sites can be handed that list tomorrow morning and run
the second-stage billing flow. One week of work for £127K of cash.
The £412K of stalled case plans is 204 specific patients who sat in front of a
surgeon, said they were interested, and went home to think about it. They were never called back.
Each one of them comes with the case complexity, the value, the days since plan presentation, and
the reason they hesitated (where captured). Call list ready to print.
This is not a "future opportunity". This is money the practice has already earned
— in clinical labour, in marketing spend, in consult time, in patient trust — that simply
hasn't been collected because somebody's system doesn't talk to somebody else's system. The
connected report makes the conversation possible.
10 Maintenance Recall: The Moat
The implant maintenance book is the practice's recurring-revenue moat.
An implant patient who attends their 6-month maintenance review for 5 years generates an
average of £1,200 of additional high-margin hygiene + review revenue — and is
4.2× less likely to develop peri-implantitis. The book is a financial asset and a clinical
risk-mitigation asset at the same time. It is currently leaking at two of three sites.
PATIENTS · MAYFAIR
The benchmark.
Post-restoration patients782
Compliance — 6mo recall attended86%
Compliance — 12mo recall attended81%
Avg maintenance fee / visit£148
Annual recurring rev per active patient£256
Total annual recurring rev (Mayfair)£200,200
Peri-implantitis incidence T12mo0.4%
PATIENTS · BRIGHTON
Drifting.
Post-restoration patients578
Compliance — 6mo recall attended71%
Compliance — 12mo recall attended62%
Avg maintenance fee / visit£140
Annual recurring rev per active patient£198
Total annual recurring rev (Brighton)£114,400
Peri-implantitis incidence T12mo1.1%
PATIENTS · LEEDS
The moat is open.
Post-restoration patients487
Compliance — 6mo recall attended38%
Compliance — 12mo recall attended29%
Avg maintenance fee / visit£128
Annual recurring rev per active patient£94
Total annual recurring rev (Leeds)£45,800
Peri-implantitis incidence T12mo2.4%
£73K/yr
LEEDS · MAINTENANCE RECALL REACTIVATION OPPORTUNITY
Reactivating Leeds's 304 lapsed maintenance patients to Mayfair's 86% compliance level is worth
£73K/year of recurring revenue — and reduces the peri-implantitis incidence rate from
2.4% to under 0.6%, which on 487 implant patients is approximately 9 fewer complications per year
(cost-avoidance of £16,500/year).
Why this is the moat
Implant practices live or die on the maintenance book.
The high-LTV implant patient who attends their 6-month recall is the closest thing a private
implant practice has to a subscription business. The patient is high-trust, high-engagement,
very unlikely to switch providers, and refers an average of 1.4 new patients over
their next five years. They also represent the practice's clinical liability tail: a patient
not under recall is a patient whose complications surface in someone else's clinic.
Mayfair's 86% compliance is the result of one specific workflow: the next maintenance
appointment is booked at the same checkout where the restoration is delivered. The patient
does not leave the building without the next appointment in the diary. Brighton has the workflow
on paper but enforcement is patchy. Leeds doesn't have the workflow at all.
This is a free 90-day fix. No new staff. No new system. Just a workflow rollout.
Lapsed maintenance recall cohort — sample callback list (top 8 by recoverable LTV)
Generated from cross-query: dim_patients.last_restoration_date + fact_appointments.last_attended + fact_treatment_codes.implant_present
PATIENTS · LEEDS
Patient-3284Full-arch upper, restored Jun 2024 · last attended Dec 2024£3,800 LTV17mo lapsed
Patient-29173 lower implants, restored Sep 2024 · last attended Mar 2025£2,400 LTV14mo lapsed
Patient-4101Single upper anterior, restored Nov 2024 · never returned£1,800 LTV18mo lapsed
Patient-35522 upper molars, restored Aug 2024 · cancelled 1 recall£2,200 LTV9mo lapsed
Patient-4288Full-arch lower, restored Oct 2024 · last attended Feb 2025£3,600 LTV15mo lapsed
Patient-37442 lower premolars, restored Jul 2024 · never returned£2,000 LTV18mo lapsed
Patient-4012Single lower molar, restored Jan 2025 · cancelled 6mo recall£1,600 LTV10mo lapsed
Patient-3198Bridge on 4 implants, restored May 2024 · last attended Nov 2024£2,900 LTV17mo lapsed
Full list of 304 patients exportable to CSV for outbound campaign. PII masked here per DentOps security policy.
11 Site Deep Dive
All three sites, side by side, on every KPI that matters for an implant practice.
One page. 38 KPIs × 3 sites. Where each pillar owns each row. Outlier cells flagged.
Use this as the management agenda — one line item per row.
KPI
Pillar
Mayfair
Brighton
Leeds
Group / Target
Growth · lead pipeline
Inbound implant leads T90
GRO
412
386
248
1,046 / target 1,200
Lead source: paid digital %
GRO
42%
64%
71%
55% group
Lead source: referral %
GRO
38%
22%
14%
26% group
Cost per lead
GRO
£68
£99.50
£118
£89 group
Lead → consult conversion
GRO
74%
56%
41%
59% group / 70% target
Stalled leads >14 days no contact
GRO
28
170
98
296
Operations · telephony & diary
Inbound call volume T90
OPS
1,184
681
512
2,377
Call answer rate
OPS
92%
81%
51%
79% group
Missed callbacks T90
OPS
95
130
271
496 (out: 68 recovered)
Surgical chair utilisation
OPS
91%
78%
51%
75% / 78% target
White space hrs/week
OPS
9.4
21.0
38.4
22.9 group
FTA rate
OPS
4.8%
8.6%
12.4%
8.1% group
Same-day-conversion at consult
OPS
64%
48%
28%
49% group
Clinical · surgeries & outcomes
Consults completed
CLI
412
386
196
994
CBCT scans
CLI
348
312
146
806
Implants placed
CLI
142
118
53
313
Full-arch cases
CLI
18
9
1
28
Guided surgery %
CLI
88%
76%
62%
78% group
Complication rate
CLI
0.7%
0.8%
1.9%
0.9% group
Implant survival (24mo cohort)
CLI
99.2%
98.6%
97.1%
98.8% group
Lab remake rate
CLI
1.2%
4.2%
2.4%
2.3% group
Restoration delivery TAT (days)
CLI
112
128
156
122 group
Finance
Revenue (cash collected) T90
FIN
£1.74M
£1.12M
£0.49M
£3.35M
Revenue per surgical hour
FIN
£610
£487
£284
£487 / £450 target
Avg case value
FIN
£7,240
£6,150
£4,820
£6,420 group
Case acceptance rate
FIN
71%
56%
41%
62.6% group
Finance package take-up
FIN
58%
66%
71%
63% group
DSO (days sales outstanding)
FIN
18
26
42
24 group
Unbilled restorations >30d
FIN
8
19
11
38 / target < 5
Patients
Post-restoration patients
PAT
782
578
487
1,847
Maintenance recall compliance
PAT
86%
71%
38%
71.2% group
Lapsed cohort >9mo
PAT
62
166
304
532 total
Recurring rev / active pt / yr
PAT
£256
£198
£94
£195 group
Peri-implantitis incidence T12mo
PAT
0.4%
1.1%
2.4%
1.1% group
Referral patients (T90)
PAT
157
86
35
278
Payroll & cost
Surgeon FTE
PAY
2.0
2.0
1.5
5.5
Coordinator FTE
PAY
2.0
1.0
0.5
3.5 / target 5.0
Surgeon payroll % of revenue
PAY
22.4%
26.1%
31.8%
25.3% group
Lab + materials % of revenue
PAY
14.0%
18.2%
15.6%
15.5% group
Margin per surgical hr
PAY
+£516
+£323
+£48
+£329 group
12 The 90-Day Plan
Sequenced actions. Early wins fund the harder work.
Ten action cards across three 30-day phases. Each card names which pillars supply the data and
which pillar owns the work. Recoverable value £1.05M across the full sequence; £414K
is bankable inside the first 30 days.
PHASE 1
Days 1–30 · Stop the bleed
£414K bankable
Run the unbilled-restoration recovery campaign at all 3 sites. 38 patients, 7 days of receptionist work, £127K cash. CLIFIN
Print Leeds's 304-name lapsed-maintenance callback list. Hygienist + receptionist work a list of 25 patients/day; reactivation conversion expected 30%. £73K/yr recurring + clinical risk reduction. PATCLI
Hire 2nd coordinator at Brighton. Job posted day 1, hired by day 21. Cost £42K/yr loaded. PAYGRO
Implement the "next-recall-at-checkout" flow at Brighton + Leeds. Workflow rollout, training, daily compliance check by manager. £58K/yr recurring uplift in Y1. PATOPS
Block Tue 2–4pm and Thu 11–1pm at Brighton as call-protected slots until 2nd coordinator starts. ~£28K recovered missed-call value in interim. OPS
PHASE 2
Days 31–60 · Capture momentum
£412K addressable
Run the 204-name stalled case-plan recovery at Brighton with the new 2nd coordinator. Scripted follow-up at days 7, 14, 30. Expected conversion 35% — £144K of stalled value recovered. GROCLI
Review & switch Brighton's lab supplier. 4.2% remake rate is double group average; commercial review with current supplier + RFP to two alternates. £58K/yr direct cost saving. CLIFIN
Pair-up: Dr. Whitfield mentors Dr. Lin on full-arch surgical protocol for 6 weeks. Target: bring per-case surgeon time from 8.9 to 8.3 hours. £46K/yr margin uplift on Brighton full-arch.CLIPAY
Activate the 428-name missed-callback campaign (Leeds-weighted) via outbound dialler. £186K recoverable lead value at 25% conversion. OPSGRO
PHASE 3
Days 61–90 · Build the system
Structural — lasting
Hire 0.5 FTE additional coordinator at Leeds (combined with marketing analyst role). Funds Phase 1 momentum. PAYGRO
Re-pitch Leeds's Google Ads + Meta campaigns with the new Phase 1 case studies and reduced cost-per-lead target (current £118, target £82). +72 leads/month at lower CAC.GRO
Roll out the Mayfair "same-day-conversion at consult" protocol to Brighton + Leeds. Training in week 9; first cohort runs week 10–12. Target: lift Brighton acceptance from 56% to 65%, Leeds from 41% to 55%. £220K annualised value.GROOPSCLI
Build the integrated maintenance-recall + complication-tracking workflow so Leeds's peri-implantitis rate is monitored monthly, not annually. CLIPAT
Re-baseline the report. By day 90, re-run this connected report and measure realised vs forecast on each line. Adjust the next quarter's plan accordingly. OPSFIN
Priority action cards — the four critical ones.
• DO FIRST · P1 · WEEK 1
Unbilled restoration recovery — group-wide
38 cases delivered Mar–Apr have no final invoice. Clinical notes show procedure complete; finance ledger has no
matching invoice raised. Per-site: Mayfair 8, Brighton 19, Leeds 11. Total recoverable: £127,400 cash,
executable in 7 days.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO
Print the patient list per site. Receptionists run second-stage billing flow Monday morning of week 1.
Practice manager signs off by Friday. By end of week 2, cash should be 80% landed.
CLI · DATAFIN · ACTIONOPS · WORKFLOW
• DO FIRST · P1 · WEEK 1
Brighton coordinator hire
One overloaded coordinator is the upstream cause of: 130 missed inbound calls, 170 cold leads, 204 stalled case plans,
21 idle surgical hours/week. Cost to fix: £42K/yr loaded. Time to fix: 21 days from job ad to start.
Lookback ROI: 4.4× in the first 90 days.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO
Brighton practice manager posts ad week 1. Interview pipeline w2–w3. Offer + start w4.
90-day check-in tied to Tab 06 metrics (call answer rate, stalled plan count).
PAY · HIREOPS · CAPACITYGRO · OUTCOME
• DO SOON · P2 · WEEK 5
Brighton lab supplier review & switch
Brighton remake rate is 4.2% vs group average 2.3% and Mayfair 1.2%. Two suppliers have submitted
comparison quotes that come in £680/case lower with published remake rate <2%. Switch is reversible.
£58K/yr direct cost saving + reduced clinical re-work + faster restoration TAT.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO
Group clinical lead + Brighton principal run a 4-week trial with Supplier B on next 8 full-arch cases.
Compare remake, fit, aesthetic outcome, TAT. Decision gate at week 8.
CLI · PROTOCOLFIN · COSTPAY · OUTCOME
• DO SOON · P2 · WEEK 4
Leeds maintenance recall reactivation
304 lapsed implant patients at Leeds. Clinical risk (peri-implantitis incidence already 2.4% vs group 1.1%) +
recurring revenue moat. Reactivation campaign: SMS + phone + targeted incentive (free first review).
£73K/yr recurring + £16.5K/yr clinical cost avoidance.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO
Leeds hygienist owns the list. 25 calls/day × 12 working days. SMS reminder + complimentary first review offer.
Target reactivation: 30% (91 patients). Tracking weekly in the connected dashboard.
PAT · DATACLI · OUTCOMEFIN · VALUE
Σ
FORECAST AT END OF 90 DAYS
If Phase 1 and Phase 2 are executed in full: group quarterly revenue moves from £3.35M to
£4.05M (+20.9%), group surgical utilisation moves from 75% to 81%, Leeds
margin per surgical hour moves from −£28 to +£138 (positive for the first time),
and the recoverable revenue stack rebuilds to a new baseline of £420K
(reflecting steady-state operational leakage at the size we've grown into).
13 The Indication Story
8% of cases. 31% of margin. The case-mix question the practice should be asking every quarter.
An implant practice's P&L is not built from "implants." It's built from six different implant indications, each with materially different
revenue, cost, and margin profiles. The CEO's question — "what's top-line vs gross margin per indication?" — is the single most important strategic frame.
This tab answers it.
£18,560 / case
★ HIGHEST-MARGIN INDICATION · ALL-ON-X IMMEDIATE-LOAD
58% margin · £148K margin contribution from just 8 cases T90.
Per surgical hour, All-on-X earns the practice £612 vs single-tooth's £820 throughput-adjusted —
but lifts margin contribution by 11× per case.
1
The 80/20: Full-arch (18 cases) + All-on-X (8 cases) = 8.3% of total volume but
35% of total gross margin. Single-tooth at 71% of cases generates 31% of margin.
The practice's growth lever is not "more implants" — it's more of the right implants.
2
All-on-X is the unlock. 58% margin per case (highest in the group), £18,560 contribution per case,
immediate-load protocol means same-day patient walkout with provisional — the patient-experience differentiator.
Mayfair runs 6 cases T90, Brighton runs 2, Leeds runs zero. The capability build at Leeds is the lever.
3
Zygomatic and Adjunct have margin compression. Both sit at 49% margin — not because case value is low
(Zygomatic is £42K, the highest), but because direct cost (specialised fixtures, bone grafts, longer surgical time) eats into the margin.
These are rescue indications, not engine indications. Volume should be steady but not growth-target.
4
The mix-shift math: every 1% of cases shifted from single-tooth to full-arch is worth
~£24K/qtr of incremental gross margin at the practice's current run-rate.
Lifting Mayfair full-arch share 13→18% alone unlocks £82K/qtr without adding chair hours, payroll or marketing spend.
The full indication economics matrix
Five base indications + adjunct procedure premium · T90 actuals · cases, top-line, direct cost, gross margin £, margin %, contribution %, and £ per surgical hour.
Adjunct procedures (bone graft, sinus lift) are overlays on base cases, not standalone case types. Implant case revenue subtotal excludes maintenance recall, CBCT consultations, and follow-up appointments (those add another £1.1M to reach the £3.35M group total).
Indication
Cases T90
Avg case £
Top-line £
Direct cost £
Gross margin £
Margin %
% total margin
£/surg hr
Single-tooth implant
223
£3,180
£709K
£341K
£368K
52%
31%
£820
Multi-tooth (2–4)
62
£8,400
£521K
£250K
£271K
52%
23%
£680
Full-arch single jaw
18
£27,300
£491K
£215K
£276K
56%
23%
£548
All-on-X immediate-load
8
£32,000
£256K
£108K
£148K
★ 58%
12%
£612
Zygomatic rescue
2
£42,000
£84K
£43K
£41K
49%
3%
£384
Adjunct procedure premium(overlay on 39 of the 313 base cases · bone graft / sinus lift)
+39
£4,800
£187K
£95K
£92K
49%
8%
£445
Implant case total (base + adjunct overlay)
313 base
£6,585
£2.25M
£1.05M
£1.20M
53.3%
100%
£642
Σ
THE CONCENTRATION INSIGHT
Full-arch + All-on-X combined: 26 cases (8.3% of volume) generating £424K of margin (35% of margin contribution).
A 1-percentage-point lift in full-arch share is worth ~£24K/qtr.
The practice already has the clinical capability and the lab supplier relationships — the constraint is upstream demand generation
(Growth pillar lead-source quality) and downstream capability build at Leeds.
Indication mix × site — where each indication actually happens
Each site indexes toward a different case-mix. Mayfair is the premium-mix site (full-arch, All-on-X, zygomatic).
Brighton is balanced. Leeds is single-tooth only — 98% of its case mix is single-tooth implant work,
which structurally caps its margin-per-surgical-hour at £337 vs Mayfair's £610.
Indication
Mayfair cases / margin
Brighton cases / margin
Leeds cases / margin
Group margin
Single-tooth
90 · £149K
89 · £147K
44 · £73K
£368K
Multi-tooth
32 · £140K
22 · £96K
8 · £35K
£271K
Full-arch single jaw
12 · £184K
5 · £77K
1 · £15K
£276K
All-on-X immediate
6 · £111K
2 · £37K
0 · —
£148K
Zygomatic rescue
2 · £41K
0 · —
0 · —
£41K
Adjunct overlay (on base cases above)
22 · £52K
14 · £33K
3 · £7K
£92K
Site margin total (base + adjunct overlay)
142 cases · £677K (56%)
118 cases · £390K (33%)
53 cases · £130K (11%)
£1.20M
Why this matters for the next 90 days
The mix shift is the highest-leverage move in the practice.
Hiring a coordinator costs £42K/yr. Switching a lab supplier saves £58K/yr. Reactivating 304 lapsed patients earns £73K/yr recurring.
These are good moves — but they are all operational levers.
Mix shift is a strategic lever, not an operational one. Lifting Mayfair full-arch share from 13% to 18% delivers
+£82K of incremental gross margin per quarter with no new payroll, no new chairs, no new marketing spend.
Just better case selection by the treatment coordinators and case-acceptance training that pushes patients
toward the right indication for their clinical situation (and for the practice's economics).
Think of it like a wine list. Every restaurant sells house wine. The margin difference between selling 100 bottles of house wine
and selling 80 house + 20 reserve list is what separates a fine-dining restaurant from a chain. Halo's reserve list is the All-on-X book.
Right now Mayfair runs it, Brighton dabbles, Leeds doesn't have one. That's the strategic question for FY27.