Halo Implant Group
Operations
Finance
Growth
Clinical
Patients
Payroll
DENTOPS · CONFIDENTIAL · BOARD REVIEW

Where the money goes, who sees it, and what to do next.

A connected report across three Halo Implant Group sites covering all six DentOps pillars — from the first inbound lead to the final restoration, from the implant coordinator's call sheet to the surgeon's day rate. The story neither a PMS nor a phone system can tell alone.

Reporting periodFeb 16 — May 16, 2026 (T90)
Trend backdropMay 2025 — May 2026
Sites coveredMayfair · Brighton · Leeds
Practice profilePrivate implant · UK
Surgeon FTE5.5
Implants placed (T90)313
Annualised revenue£12.5M
01 The Picture

Five things you cannot see in any one system on its own.

Each of the five paragraphs below joins two or more of the six pillars of the practice — a story that the CRM, phone system, PMS, finance ledger, payroll spreadsheet, or hygiene book cannot tell alone. Together they explain £1.05M of revenue Halo is leaving on the table in the next 90 days.

£1.05M
RECOVERABLE REVENUE — T90 ACTIONABLE Stalled case plans, missed callbacks, lapsed maintenance recalls, restoration billing gaps, coordinator drop-offs and avoidable lab remakes — ranked by difficulty in Tab 09.
1
The Coordinator Bottleneck. Halo Brighton brought in 386 implant leads across the last 90 days — the highest of any site — but converted only 56% to a booked consult. The CRM shows the leads. The phone system shows 22 hours of unanswered inbound on Tuesday afternoons. The payroll record shows one coordinator covering both consult intake and treatment-plan follow-up. Adding a second coordinator at Brighton (£42K/yr fully loaded) plausibly recovers £186K of stalled lead value. See Tab 06.
2
Halo Leeds is losing money per surgical hour. The PMS shows surgical utilisation at 51%. The finance ledger shows revenue per surgical hour at £284. Payroll shows the principal's fully-loaded cost per surgical hour at £312. Every surgical hour at Leeds currently destroys £28 of margin. This is invisible from a P&L because the locum income covers the gap. See Tab 07.
3
The full-arch story is the group's real engine. Across the group, 28 full-arch cases T90 generated £782K of revenue — 24% of all cash collected from 8% of cases. But lab remake rate at Brighton (4.2%) is double the group average, and surgeon time per full-arch at Brighton is 38 minutes longer than at Mayfair. Bringing Brighton in line is worth £104K/yr in margin. See Tab 08.
4
The implant maintenance book is the moat — and it's leaking. 1,847 patients are post-restoration across the group. Implant maintenance recall compliance is 86% at Mayfair, 71% at Brighton, and 38% at Leeds. Every lapsed maintenance patient is on average £240/yr of high-margin revenue lost forever, and 4.2× more likely to develop peri-implantitis — a complication that costs an average of £1,840 to manage. Reactivating Leeds's 304 lapsed patients is worth £73K/yr recurring. See Tab 10.
5
£127K of completed restorations are unbilled. Clinical records show 38 restorations delivered in March and April that have no final invoice raised in the finance ledger — the second-stage billing is falling through the gap between the surgeon's notes and the front desk's checkout flow. This is one workflow change, executable in 7 days, worth £127K of immediate cash with no new clinical work. See Tab 09.
Plain English

Why a "connected report" matters for an implant clinic specifically.

An implant patient is not a hygiene patient. The average implant case at Halo is worth £6,400 and runs for 8–14 months from first call to final restoration. That patient touches the practice through the CRM (the inbound enquiry), the phone system (every call back and reschedule), the PMS (every CBCT, consult, surgery and review), the lab (impressions and crowns), the finance ledger (deposit, stage payments, final invoice, finance company), the surgeon's day rate (payroll), and eventually the maintenance recall book (lifetime value).

Any one system tells you a partial truth. The PMS shows surgeries done. The phone system shows calls answered. Neither one can tell you whether the £186K of stalled Brighton leads are stalled because the leads are bad, the coordinator is overloaded, the surgeon's diary is full, or the finance package keeps being declined. The connected report is the only place that question has an answer.

Think of it like an airline. The check-in counter, the gate, the bag belt and the cabin crew each have a screen with their slice. But it's only when you put them together that you discover the flight is leaving with 14 empty seats while 22 passengers were turned away at re-booking because nobody could see both screens at once. That's what this report does for Halo.
02 Headline Numbers

The trailing-90-day picture across all six pillars.

Group-level metrics for Feb 16 – May 16, 2026. Each tile is colour-coded by which DentOps pillar owns the number. Site-level breakdown follows in Tab 04.

Growth
Inbound implant leads
1,847
+18.4% vs prior 90 days
Operations
Call answer rate (group)
79.2%
Leeds at 51% drags average
Growth
Consult bookings
1,082
58.6% lead-to-consult
Clinical
Consults completed
994
FTA rate 8.1%
Clinical
Case plans accepted
426
62.6% acceptance rate
Clinical
Implants placed
313
28 full-arch · 71 multi-tooth · 214 single
Operations
Surgical chair utilisation
75.4%
Range 51%–91% across sites
Finance
Cash collected (T90)
£3.35M
+12.1% vs prior 90 days
Finance
Revenue per surgical hour (group)
£487
Mayfair £610, Brighton £487, Leeds £284
Finance
Avg case value (all-implant)
£6,420
Full-arch £28K avg; single-tooth £3,180 avg
Patients
Maintenance recall compliance
71.2%
Leeds at 38% — clinical risk
Payroll
Surgeon payroll % of revenue
25.3%
Target 22–26%
Payroll
Lab + materials % of revenue
15.5%
Brighton at 18.2% drags average
Growth
Open case plans >30 days
142
£412K stalled value
Operations
Missed inbound callbacks (T90)
428
63% are at Leeds
All Pillars
Recoverable revenue (T90 actionable)
£1.05M
Stacked by source in Tab 09
Revenue trend — trailing 12 months
Monthly cash collected, group total
FINANCE
Implants placed — trailing 12 months
Monthly count by complexity tier
CLINICAL
Lead source mix (T90)
Where the 1,847 inbound leads came from
GROWTH
Group P&L slice (T90)
Revenue · lab · surgeon payroll · nurse + support · overhead · net
FINANCE + PAYROLL

Top-line vs gross margin · per implant indication · T90

The single most important breakdown for an implant practice — which case types are actually generating the margin. Full-arch + All-on-X = 8.3% of cases but 35% of total gross margin. The CEO's question: are we shifting the mix toward the high-margin indications fast enough?

Indication Cases T90 Avg case £ Top-line £ Gross margin £ Margin % % of total margin
Single-tooth implant 223 £3,180 £709K £368K 52% 31%
Multi-tooth (2–4 implants) 62 £8,400 £521K £271K 52% 23%
Full-arch single jaw 18 £27,300 £491K £276K 56% 23%
All-on-X immediate-load 8 £32,000 £256K £148K ★ 58% 12%
Zygomatic rescue 2 £42,000 £84K £41K 49% 3%
Adjunct procedure premium (overlay on 39 of the base cases · bone graft / sinus lift) +39 £4,800 £187K £92K 49% 8%
Implant case total (base 313 cases · adjunct as overlay · excludes maintenance + recall) 313 £6,585 £2.25M £1.20M 53.3% 100%

Full deep-dive on this in Tab 13 · The Indication Story →

03 What's Working

Eight things the group is doing right — credited to the people doing them.

Before we get to the leaks. The basics across the group are largely sound, which is why the recoverable revenue figures in Tab 09 are large rather than terrifying.

• WIN 01 · OPERATIONS · MAYFAIR

Mayfair surgical utilisation is best-in-class.

91%

Across 12 surgical chairs at Mayfair, 91% of available surgical minutes are billed. Industry benchmark for premium implant practices is 78–82%.

Credit goes to: Mayfair diary management & Dr. Whitfield's 6-week rolling planning rhythm.
• WIN 02 · CLINICAL

Group complication rate is below the published implant benchmark.

0.9%

Across 313 implants placed in the trailing 90 days, 3 cases recorded a complication requiring intervention. Industry published rate for guided implant surgery is 1.5–2.2%.

Credit goes to: surgical protocols enforced across all 3 sites, mandatory CBCT pre-op, guided surgery for 78% of cases.
• WIN 03 · GROWTH · MAYFAIR

Mayfair's case acceptance rate at the consult is exceptional.

71%

71% of presented case plans at Mayfair convert to a paid deposit. Brighton is at 56%, Leeds at 41%. Mayfair's "same-day deposit" protocol works.

Credit goes to: Mayfair coordinator Sophie Bennett & the integrated finance options presented at consult.
• WIN 04 · PATIENTS · MAYFAIR

Mayfair maintenance recall compliance is best-practice.

86%

86% of post-restoration patients at Mayfair attend their 6-month implant maintenance review. The bonded crown lifetime extends by 4–6 years at this compliance level.

Credit goes to: hygienist Joanna Park's pre-book-at-checkout flow.
• WIN 05 · FINANCE

Deposit collection rate held at >90% across all three sites.

90.8%

426 case plans accepted in T90 generated 387 paid deposits. Only 39 cases stalled at the deposit step — well within best-practice tolerance.

Credit goes to: integrated finance providers offering 0% finance up to £12K; deposit-at-consult workflow.
• WIN 06 · CLINICAL · FULL-ARCH

Full-arch is now the group's highest-margin product.

62% margin

28 full-arch cases T90 generated £782K revenue at 62% gross margin after lab, materials and surgeon time. Single-tooth implants average 48% margin.

Credit goes to: Dr. Whitfield's pivot to All-on-4 protocols in Q4 2025; Brighton picking up the playbook.
• WIN 07 · OPERATIONS · MAYFAIR

Same-day-conversion-at-consult at Mayfair is exceptional.

64%

64% of consults at Mayfair walk out with a surgery date in the diary on the same day. This collapses the lead-to-surgery cycle from 47 days (industry avg) to 19 days at Mayfair.

Credit goes to: Mayfair's integrated consult workflow (clinical findings → CBCT review → plan → deposit → date) in one visit.
• WIN 08 · LEADERSHIP

Halo invested in Leeds early — before the numbers are this report.

2 yrs

Leeds opened May 2024. The leadership knew Q1 ramp would be slow. The numbers below are not failure — they are diagnosis. The investment is recoverable on the 90-day plan in Tab 12.

Credit goes to: the call to open Leeds at all, in a market that has no other premium implant clinic within a 35-mile radius.
04 Three Sites

Three sites. Three completely different management conversations.

The group P&L hides three radically different operational stories. The same KPI set that looks healthy at group level reveals a flagship, a growth site fighting a coordinator bottleneck, and a site that needs urgent action this quarter.

• FLAGSHIP · HOLD

Halo Mayfair

London W1 · est. 2014 · 2 surgeons · 6 chairs
88
Health score (out of 100)
Revenue T90£1.74M
Surgical utilisation91%
Implants placed142
Full-arch cases18
Case acceptance71%
Revenue per surgical hr£610
Maintenance recall86%
Recoverable revenue£186K
• GROWTH · UNBLOCK

Halo Brighton

Brighton BN1 · est. 2020 · 2 surgeons · 4 chairs
71
Health score (out of 100)
Revenue T90£1.12M (+28% YoY)
Surgical utilisation78%
Implants placed118
Full-arch cases9 (lab issues)
Case acceptance56%
Revenue per surgical hr£487
Maintenance recall71%
Recoverable revenue£412K
• STRUGGLING · URGENT

Halo Leeds

Leeds LS1 · est. 2024 · 1.5 FTE surgeons · 3 chairs
48
Health score (out of 100)
Revenue T90£0.49M
Surgical utilisation51%
Implants placed53
Full-arch cases1
Case acceptance41%
Revenue per surgical hr£284
Maintenance recall38%
Recoverable revenue£452K
Reading the three sites together

The same KPI set tells three different stories.

Mayfair is operating near the ceiling of what a 6-chair central London implant clinic can do. The 90-day move at Mayfair is not to push utilisation higher (it's already 91%) but to capture more value per chair-hour by pushing the full-arch share of case mix.

Brighton has the demand (386 leads, biggest in the group) but is choking on the operational capacity to convert it. The diagnosis is concrete: a single overloaded coordinator, a lab supplier with an above-average remake rate, and full-arch cases taking 38 minutes longer than at Mayfair. All three are fixable. See Tabs 06, 08.

Leeds needs urgent intervention. The site is two years old, the surgeon is good, but every single connected KPI is below target — call answer, case acceptance, surgical utilisation, maintenance recall, revenue per hour. The good news: each one has a defined 30/60/90-day action with a known revenue uplift. See Tab 12, P1 column.

Think of the three sites as a 50-meter swimming pool, a leaky garden hose, and a closed tap. Mayfair is the pool — full, working hard, but bounded by physical size. Brighton is the hose — plenty of water pressure (leads) but losing flow through a dozen small holes. Leeds is the tap — the water is sitting on the supply side, but very little is making it through to the bucket. Each needs a completely different fix.
05 Lead → Restoration

One implant patient. Ten steps. Six systems underneath.

Every patient walks this same 10-step journey from inbound enquiry to final restoration delivery. At each step, a different DentOps pillar owns the data. The drop-off at each step is shown below — because if you don't see the drop-off, you can't fix the leak.

Implant patient journey funnel
Group total · trailing 90 days · Feb 16 — May 16, 2026
ALL PILLARS
Inbound implant leads Growth Web form · phone · referral · walk-in · consultant referral
1,847100%
Call answered / form actioned Operations Coordinator picks up or follows up within SLA
1,46379.2%−384
Consult booked Growth Initial consultation in the diary, with a date
1,08258.6%−381
Consult attended Clinical Patient showed up, clinical assessment completed
99453.8%−88 FTA
CBCT scan completed Clinical Required for any implant case plan
80643.6%−188
Case plan presented Growth Treatment plan with options + price + finance
68136.9%−125
Case plan accepted Growth Patient said yes — either in person or by callback
42623.1%−255
Deposit paid Finance Cash or finance package executed
38721.0%−39
Surgery completed Clinical Implant fixture placed · integration phase begins
35819.4%−29 deferred
Restoration delivered Clinical Final crown / bridge / arch fitted
31216.9%−46 in healing
Booked into maintenance recall Patients First 6-month implant maintenance review in the diary
22712.3%−85 not booked
!

THE BIGGEST SINGLE LEAK

From 681 plans presented to 426 plans accepted — the practice loses 255 patients in this single step. That is 14% of every inbound lead, and at the group's £6,420 average case value, it represents £1.64M of treatment value that walked out of the consult room and never came back. Mayfair converts 71% at this step. Leeds converts 41%. Closing the 30-point gap at Leeds alone is worth £185K–£240K. See Tab 06 for the coordinator-bottleneck diagnosis.

Where the systems hand off

Six pillars, ten steps, one patient.

The journey above is colour-coded by which pillar owns each step. The handoffs are where things go wrong:

Step 2 → 3 (Ops → Growth): a call gets answered but the coordinator doesn't book a consult. 384 leads vanish here.
Step 5 → 6 (Clinical → Growth): a CBCT is taken but a case plan never goes back to the patient. 125 leads vanish here.
Step 7 → 8 (Growth → Finance): patient says yes but the deposit doesn't land. 39 leads vanish here.
Step 10 → 11 (Clinical → Patients): restoration delivered but no maintenance recall booked. 85 patients exit unprotected.

Each of these handoffs is between two pillars. Each one is invisible if you only look at one pillar's dashboard. This is the case for DentOps.

06 Coordinator Bottleneck

The Brighton story: when you have more demand than capacity to convert it.

Halo Brighton brought in 386 implant leads this quarter — the most of any site in the group. It converted only 56%. Three pillars together explain why, and one hire fixes it.

GROWTH · CRM

Brighton has the largest lead pipeline in the group.

Inbound leads (T90)386
% from paid (Meta + Google)64%
Marketing spend (T90)£38,420
Cost per lead£99.50
Consults booked from leads216
Lead → consult conversion56%
Stalled leads >14 days no contact170

OPERATIONS · TELEPHONY

The phone system shows when the leads bleed out.

Inbound implant calls (T90)681
Call answer rate81%
Missed calls (T90)130
Missed call hours, weekly avg8.4 hrs
Worst hour: Tue 2–4pm42% answer
Worst hour: Thu 11–1pm51% answer
Median callback time18.5 hrs

PAYROLL · STAFFING

The payroll record explains both numbers.

Coordinator FTE at Brighton1.0
Coordinators at Mayfair (smaller pipeline)2.0
Coordinator cost (Brighton, T90)£10,500
Coordinator workload — consults216 consults
Coordinator workload — plan follow-ups204 open plans
Coordinator workload — deposit chasing62 stages
Total open work-items per coord482

CLINICAL · THE COST OF NOT FIXING

Brighton's surgeons are sitting idle while leads stall.

Surgical chair utilisation78%
Idle surgical hours per week (group avg)28 hrs
Brighton idle hours per week21 hrs
Stalled case plan value >30d£186,400
Lapsed lead value (no-contact >14d)£144,800
Marketing £ per converted patient£178
Marketing £ per captured case£317
Σ

THE CONNECTED DIAGNOSIS

Brighton is paying £38K/quarter for paid leads, generating 681 inbound calls, missing 130 of them (mostly Tue and Thu afternoons), letting 170 leads go cold and 204 case plans stall >30 days, all because one coordinator is doing the work of two. The surgeons are sitting idle 21 hours a week waiting for the diary to fill. The fix is £42K/yr fully loaded for a second coordinator. The recovered revenue at 50% conversion of the stalled pipeline is £186K in the first 90 days alone.

Brighton — call answer rate heatmap by hour and day
Last 90 days · darker = lower answer rate
OPERATIONS
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
9–11am
88%
85%
86%
78%
81%
11am–1pm
79%
68%
76%
51%
72%
1–2pm
61%
54%
63%
58%
66%
2–4pm
76%
42%
71%
58%
64%
4–6pm
82%
74%
84%
73%
85%

The two worst cells (Tue 2–4pm at 42%, Thu 11–1pm at 51%) are when the single coordinator is in back-to-back consults. These two slots alone account for 68 of the 130 missed calls T90. A second coordinator covers exactly these gaps.

07 Surgical Hour Economics

Revenue per surgical hour − fully-loaded cost per surgical hour = margin per surgeon per site.

The single most important number for an implant practice: what is each surgeon's hour actually worth? Three pillars (Ops, Finance, Payroll) must join cleanly to compute it. Halo Leeds is currently negative.

Surgeon · Site Role Surg hrs T90 OPS Util % Revenue generated FIN Rev / surg hr Fully-loaded cost / hr PAY Margin / hr
Dr. James Whitfield
Mayfair · Principal · Full-arch lead
Principal 1,124 93% £0.94M £836 £298 +£538
Dr. Priya Mehta
Mayfair · Single + multi-tooth
Associate 1,058 88% £0.80M £756 £262 +£494
Dr. Marcus Lin
Brighton · Principal
Principal 1,012 82% £0.61M £603 £285 +£318
Dr. Sarah Okafor
Brighton · Growing single + multi
Associate 894 74% £0.51M £570 £241 +£329
Dr. Aleksi Korhonen
Leeds · Principal · Single only
Principal 832 53% £0.28M £337 £365 −£28
Locum (Leeds rota)
Leeds · 0.5 FTE
Locum 386 48% £0.21M £544 £420 +£124
Group total 5.5 FTE 5,306 75% £3.35M £631 £302 +£329
£28/hr
DR. KORHONEN AT LEEDS · MARGIN PER SURGICAL HOUR Every surgical hour at Halo Leeds with the principal surgeon currently destroys £28 of margin. Across 832 hours T90 that is £23,300 of operational loss, masked at group level by Mayfair's profitability. The lever is not the surgeon's skill (it's fine) — the lever is utilisation. Pushing Leeds from 53% to 70% util alone moves margin per hour from −£28 to +£138.
What "fully-loaded cost per hour" means

The cost number that nobody computes — until it's too late.

Fully-loaded cost per surgical hour = base salary or day rate + employer's NI + pension + allocated overhead (nurse cost, room cost, sterilisation, supplies, software) + employer's portion of insurance · divided by actually-billed surgical hours.

This is the true denominator for surgeon profitability. A surgeon on a £250K package, with full overhead allocation of £180K (typical for implant practice), needs to deliver £430K of clinical revenue just to break even. At 1,500 billed surgical hours/yr that is £287/hr break-even. At 900 hours (53% util), break-even jumps to £478/hr.

It's the airline empty-seat problem. The plane's flying anyway. The crew, the fuel, the gate fees — all sunk. Every unsold seat is pure margin loss. A surgical chair is the same. The cost is paid whether the chair is occupied or not. Halo Leeds is currently flying with half-empty seats.
08 Full-Arch Unit Economics

The All-on-4 case — what it really costs, what it really earns, and why Brighton is leaking margin.

Five pillars must join cleanly to give you the answer: Clinical (case complexity), Finance (revenue and material cost), Payroll (surgeon and nurse time), Operations (room time), Patients (LTV from long-term maintenance). Below: the same case modelled at all three sites.

Model case: All-on-4 single-arch, immediate-load, guided surgery, conventional finance package
Avg case value at Halo · T90 actual deliveries · numbers below are the group average; site-specific variances follow
Revenue components
Consultation + CBCT fee£420
Surgical placement (4 implants)£14,800
Provisional restoration£3,200
Definitive zirconia bridge£8,400
Healing & review appts£480
Total case revenue£27,300
Direct costs CLI PAY
Implant fixtures (4 × Straumann)£1,840
Abutments & components£640
Provisional lab fee£780
Definitive zirconia bridge lab£3,420
Surgeon time (8.5 hrs × loaded rate)£2,565
Surgical nurse + assistant time£640
Total direct cost£9,885
Indirect & opportunity
Allocated overhead (room, sterilisation)£980
Coordinator + admin time£340
Finance company fee (2.4% on £18k)£432
Marketing attributable cost£280
Allowance for lab remake (1.8% group)£76
Total indirect£2,108
Case revenue
£27,300
Total cost
£11,993
Net margin / case
£15,307
Margin %
56.1%

Same case, three sites.

Component Mayfair Brighton Leeds Group avg
Case revenue (avg actual) £28,420 £26,180 £24,800 £27,300
Surgeon time · hours per case 8.2 8.9 9.4 8.5
Surgeon cost per case £2,444 £2,537 £3,431 £2,565
Lab cost per case £4,020 £4,820 £4,200 £4,200
Lab remake rate 1.2% 4.2% 2.4% 2.3%
Total cost per case £11,224 £12,815 £12,910 £11,993
Net margin per case £17,196 £13,365 £11,890 £15,307
Margin % 60.5% 51.0% 47.9% 56.1%
Full-arch cases T90 18 9 1 28
Full-arch margin T90 £309,528 £120,285 £11,890 £441,703
Δ

BRIGHTON IS LEAKING £3,831 OF MARGIN PER FULL-ARCH CASE

Brighton runs 42 minutes longer per case (surgeon time leakage), spends £800 more on lab (different supplier), and remakes 4.2% of bridges vs. Mayfair's 1.2%. At Brighton's current full-arch run rate of 36 cases/yr, bringing those three lines in line with Mayfair recovers £138K of annual margin. Lab supplier review, surgical protocol benchmarking against Whitfield's technique, and a 6-week mentoring pair-up are the three plays in the 90-day plan.

09 Recoverable Revenue

£1.05M sitting in the gaps between systems — ranked by how hard it is to recover.

Every recoverable line below comes from a cross-pillar query. None of them are visible from a single system's dashboard. All of them have a named patient list behind the number (Tab 10 onward). Ordered easiest to hardest in the next 90 days.

Recoverable revenue stack · T90 actionable

£1,052,400
Unbilled completed restorations CLIFIN 38 cases delivered Mar–Apr with no final invoice raised
£127,40012.1% · easy
Stalled case plans >30 days (Brighton-dominant) GROPAY 204 plans presented but not yet accepted/declined; coordinator follow-up
£412,80039.2% · medium
Missed inbound callbacks OPSGRO 428 missed calls T90, 63% at Leeds; outbound campaign
£186,20017.7% · medium
Lapsed maintenance recall cohort PATCLI 532 patients overdue 9–18 months, 304 at Leeds
£148,30014.1% · medium
Brighton full-arch margin leak CLIPAYFIN 42-min surgeon overrun + 4.2% remake rate + lab supplier
£104,2009.9% · medium
Coordinator-gap dropped consults OPSPAYGRO Brighton + Leeds coordinator under-staffing
£86,8008.3% · medium
Finance package decline recovery FINGRO 62 accepted plans where finance package declined; 2nd-provider workflow
£63,8006.1% · medium
Stage payments not chased FINCLI Multi-stage cases with 2nd/3rd payments uncollected past due date
£27,4002.6% · easy
How to read the stack

Every line traces to a named patient list. Nothing is theoretical.

The £127K of unbilled restorations is 38 specific patients whose final crowns were cemented in March or April. Their clinical notes show the procedure done; the finance ledger has no matching invoice. Receptionists at all three sites can be handed that list tomorrow morning and run the second-stage billing flow. One week of work for £127K of cash.

The £412K of stalled case plans is 204 specific patients who sat in front of a surgeon, said they were interested, and went home to think about it. They were never called back. Each one of them comes with the case complexity, the value, the days since plan presentation, and the reason they hesitated (where captured). Call list ready to print.

This is not a "future opportunity". This is money the practice has already earned — in clinical labour, in marketing spend, in consult time, in patient trust — that simply hasn't been collected because somebody's system doesn't talk to somebody else's system. The connected report makes the conversation possible.
10 Maintenance Recall: The Moat

The implant maintenance book is the practice's recurring-revenue moat.

An implant patient who attends their 6-month maintenance review for 5 years generates an average of £1,200 of additional high-margin hygiene + review revenue — and is 4.2× less likely to develop peri-implantitis. The book is a financial asset and a clinical risk-mitigation asset at the same time. It is currently leaking at two of three sites.

PATIENTS · MAYFAIR

The benchmark.

Post-restoration patients782
Compliance — 6mo recall attended86%
Compliance — 12mo recall attended81%
Avg maintenance fee / visit£148
Annual recurring rev per active patient£256
Total annual recurring rev (Mayfair)£200,200
Peri-implantitis incidence T12mo0.4%

PATIENTS · BRIGHTON

Drifting.

Post-restoration patients578
Compliance — 6mo recall attended71%
Compliance — 12mo recall attended62%
Avg maintenance fee / visit£140
Annual recurring rev per active patient£198
Total annual recurring rev (Brighton)£114,400
Peri-implantitis incidence T12mo1.1%

PATIENTS · LEEDS

The moat is open.

Post-restoration patients487
Compliance — 6mo recall attended38%
Compliance — 12mo recall attended29%
Avg maintenance fee / visit£128
Annual recurring rev per active patient£94
Total annual recurring rev (Leeds)£45,800
Peri-implantitis incidence T12mo2.4%
£73K/yr
LEEDS · MAINTENANCE RECALL REACTIVATION OPPORTUNITY Reactivating Leeds's 304 lapsed maintenance patients to Mayfair's 86% compliance level is worth £73K/year of recurring revenue — and reduces the peri-implantitis incidence rate from 2.4% to under 0.6%, which on 487 implant patients is approximately 9 fewer complications per year (cost-avoidance of £16,500/year).
Why this is the moat

Implant practices live or die on the maintenance book.

The high-LTV implant patient who attends their 6-month recall is the closest thing a private implant practice has to a subscription business. The patient is high-trust, high-engagement, very unlikely to switch providers, and refers an average of 1.4 new patients over their next five years. They also represent the practice's clinical liability tail: a patient not under recall is a patient whose complications surface in someone else's clinic.

Mayfair's 86% compliance is the result of one specific workflow: the next maintenance appointment is booked at the same checkout where the restoration is delivered. The patient does not leave the building without the next appointment in the diary. Brighton has the workflow on paper but enforcement is patchy. Leeds doesn't have the workflow at all.

This is a free 90-day fix. No new staff. No new system. Just a workflow rollout.

Lapsed maintenance recall cohort — sample callback list (top 8 by recoverable LTV)
Generated from cross-query: dim_patients.last_restoration_date + fact_appointments.last_attended + fact_treatment_codes.implant_present
PATIENTS · LEEDS
Patient-3284Full-arch upper, restored Jun 2024 · last attended Dec 2024£3,800 LTV17mo lapsed
Patient-29173 lower implants, restored Sep 2024 · last attended Mar 2025£2,400 LTV14mo lapsed
Patient-4101Single upper anterior, restored Nov 2024 · never returned£1,800 LTV18mo lapsed
Patient-35522 upper molars, restored Aug 2024 · cancelled 1 recall£2,200 LTV9mo lapsed
Patient-4288Full-arch lower, restored Oct 2024 · last attended Feb 2025£3,600 LTV15mo lapsed
Patient-37442 lower premolars, restored Jul 2024 · never returned£2,000 LTV18mo lapsed
Patient-4012Single lower molar, restored Jan 2025 · cancelled 6mo recall£1,600 LTV10mo lapsed
Patient-3198Bridge on 4 implants, restored May 2024 · last attended Nov 2024£2,900 LTV17mo lapsed

Full list of 304 patients exportable to CSV for outbound campaign. PII masked here per DentOps security policy.

11 Site Deep Dive

All three sites, side by side, on every KPI that matters for an implant practice.

One page. 38 KPIs × 3 sites. Where each pillar owns each row. Outlier cells flagged. Use this as the management agenda — one line item per row.

KPI Pillar Mayfair Brighton Leeds Group / Target
Growth · lead pipeline
Inbound implant leads T90GRO4123862481,046 / target 1,200
Lead source: paid digital %GRO42%64%71%55% group
Lead source: referral %GRO38%22%14%26% group
Cost per leadGRO£68£99.50£118£89 group
Lead → consult conversionGRO74%56%41%59% group / 70% target
Stalled leads >14 days no contactGRO2817098296
Operations · telephony & diary
Inbound call volume T90OPS1,1846815122,377
Call answer rateOPS92%81%51%79% group
Missed callbacks T90OPS95130271496 (out: 68 recovered)
Surgical chair utilisationOPS91%78%51%75% / 78% target
White space hrs/weekOPS9.421.038.422.9 group
FTA rateOPS4.8%8.6%12.4%8.1% group
Same-day-conversion at consultOPS64%48%28%49% group
Clinical · surgeries & outcomes
Consults completedCLI412386196994
CBCT scansCLI348312146806
Implants placedCLI14211853313
Full-arch casesCLI189128
Guided surgery %CLI88%76%62%78% group
Complication rateCLI0.7%0.8%1.9%0.9% group
Implant survival (24mo cohort)CLI99.2%98.6%97.1%98.8% group
Lab remake rateCLI1.2%4.2%2.4%2.3% group
Restoration delivery TAT (days)CLI112128156122 group
Finance
Revenue (cash collected) T90FIN£1.74M£1.12M£0.49M£3.35M
Revenue per surgical hourFIN£610£487£284£487 / £450 target
Avg case valueFIN£7,240£6,150£4,820£6,420 group
Case acceptance rateFIN71%56%41%62.6% group
Finance package take-upFIN58%66%71%63% group
DSO (days sales outstanding)FIN18264224 group
Unbilled restorations >30dFIN8191138 / target < 5
Patients
Post-restoration patientsPAT7825784871,847
Maintenance recall compliancePAT86%71%38%71.2% group
Lapsed cohort >9moPAT62166304532 total
Recurring rev / active pt / yrPAT£256£198£94£195 group
Peri-implantitis incidence T12moPAT0.4%1.1%2.4%1.1% group
Referral patients (T90)PAT1578635278
Payroll & cost
Surgeon FTEPAY2.02.01.55.5
Coordinator FTEPAY2.01.00.53.5 / target 5.0
Surgeon payroll % of revenuePAY22.4%26.1%31.8%25.3% group
Lab + materials % of revenuePAY14.0%18.2%15.6%15.5% group
Margin per surgical hrPAY+£516+£323+£48+£329 group
12 The 90-Day Plan

Sequenced actions. Early wins fund the harder work.

Ten action cards across three 30-day phases. Each card names which pillars supply the data and which pillar owns the work. Recoverable value £1.05M across the full sequence; £414K is bankable inside the first 30 days.

PHASE 1
Days 1–30 · Stop the bleed
£414K bankable
  • Run the unbilled-restoration recovery campaign at all 3 sites. 38 patients, 7 days of receptionist work, £127K cash. CLI FIN
  • Print Leeds's 304-name lapsed-maintenance callback list. Hygienist + receptionist work a list of 25 patients/day; reactivation conversion expected 30%. £73K/yr recurring + clinical risk reduction. PAT CLI
  • Hire 2nd coordinator at Brighton. Job posted day 1, hired by day 21. Cost £42K/yr loaded. PAY GRO
  • Implement the "next-recall-at-checkout" flow at Brighton + Leeds. Workflow rollout, training, daily compliance check by manager. £58K/yr recurring uplift in Y1. PAT OPS
  • Block Tue 2–4pm and Thu 11–1pm at Brighton as call-protected slots until 2nd coordinator starts. ~£28K recovered missed-call value in interim. OPS
PHASE 2
Days 31–60 · Capture momentum
£412K addressable
  • Run the 204-name stalled case-plan recovery at Brighton with the new 2nd coordinator. Scripted follow-up at days 7, 14, 30. Expected conversion 35% — £144K of stalled value recovered. GRO CLI
  • Review & switch Brighton's lab supplier. 4.2% remake rate is double group average; commercial review with current supplier + RFP to two alternates. £58K/yr direct cost saving. CLI FIN
  • Pair-up: Dr. Whitfield mentors Dr. Lin on full-arch surgical protocol for 6 weeks. Target: bring per-case surgeon time from 8.9 to 8.3 hours. £46K/yr margin uplift on Brighton full-arch. CLI PAY
  • Activate the 428-name missed-callback campaign (Leeds-weighted) via outbound dialler. £186K recoverable lead value at 25% conversion. OPS GRO
PHASE 3
Days 61–90 · Build the system
Structural — lasting
  • Hire 0.5 FTE additional coordinator at Leeds (combined with marketing analyst role). Funds Phase 1 momentum. PAY GRO
  • Re-pitch Leeds's Google Ads + Meta campaigns with the new Phase 1 case studies and reduced cost-per-lead target (current £118, target £82). +72 leads/month at lower CAC. GRO
  • Roll out the Mayfair "same-day-conversion at consult" protocol to Brighton + Leeds. Training in week 9; first cohort runs week 10–12. Target: lift Brighton acceptance from 56% to 65%, Leeds from 41% to 55%. £220K annualised value. GRO OPS CLI
  • Build the integrated maintenance-recall + complication-tracking workflow so Leeds's peri-implantitis rate is monitored monthly, not annually. CLI PAT
  • Re-baseline the report. By day 90, re-run this connected report and measure realised vs forecast on each line. Adjust the next quarter's plan accordingly. OPS FIN

Priority action cards — the four critical ones.

• DO FIRST · P1 · WEEK 1
Unbilled restoration recovery — group-wide
38 cases delivered Mar–Apr have no final invoice. Clinical notes show procedure complete; finance ledger has no matching invoice raised. Per-site: Mayfair 8, Brighton 19, Leeds 11. Total recoverable: £127,400 cash, executable in 7 days.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO Print the patient list per site. Receptionists run second-stage billing flow Monday morning of week 1. Practice manager signs off by Friday. By end of week 2, cash should be 80% landed.
CLI · DATA FIN · ACTION OPS · WORKFLOW
• DO FIRST · P1 · WEEK 1
Brighton coordinator hire
One overloaded coordinator is the upstream cause of: 130 missed inbound calls, 170 cold leads, 204 stalled case plans, 21 idle surgical hours/week. Cost to fix: £42K/yr loaded. Time to fix: 21 days from job ad to start. Lookback ROI: 4.4× in the first 90 days.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO Brighton practice manager posts ad week 1. Interview pipeline w2–w3. Offer + start w4. 90-day check-in tied to Tab 06 metrics (call answer rate, stalled plan count).
PAY · HIRE OPS · CAPACITY GRO · OUTCOME
• DO SOON · P2 · WEEK 5
Brighton lab supplier review & switch
Brighton remake rate is 4.2% vs group average 2.3% and Mayfair 1.2%. Two suppliers have submitted comparison quotes that come in £680/case lower with published remake rate <2%. Switch is reversible. £58K/yr direct cost saving + reduced clinical re-work + faster restoration TAT.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO Group clinical lead + Brighton principal run a 4-week trial with Supplier B on next 8 full-arch cases. Compare remake, fit, aesthetic outcome, TAT. Decision gate at week 8.
CLI · PROTOCOL FIN · COST PAY · OUTCOME
• DO SOON · P2 · WEEK 4
Leeds maintenance recall reactivation
304 lapsed implant patients at Leeds. Clinical risk (peri-implantitis incidence already 2.4% vs group 1.1%) + recurring revenue moat. Reactivation campaign: SMS + phone + targeted incentive (free first review). £73K/yr recurring + £16.5K/yr clinical cost avoidance.
WHAT TO ACTUALLY DO Leeds hygienist owns the list. 25 calls/day × 12 working days. SMS reminder + complimentary first review offer. Target reactivation: 30% (91 patients). Tracking weekly in the connected dashboard.
PAT · DATA CLI · OUTCOME FIN · VALUE
Σ

FORECAST AT END OF 90 DAYS

If Phase 1 and Phase 2 are executed in full: group quarterly revenue moves from £3.35M to £4.05M (+20.9%), group surgical utilisation moves from 75% to 81%, Leeds margin per surgical hour moves from −£28 to +£138 (positive for the first time), and the recoverable revenue stack rebuilds to a new baseline of £420K (reflecting steady-state operational leakage at the size we've grown into).

13 The Indication Story

8% of cases. 31% of margin. The case-mix question the practice should be asking every quarter.

An implant practice's P&L is not built from "implants." It's built from six different implant indications, each with materially different revenue, cost, and margin profiles. The CEO's question — "what's top-line vs gross margin per indication?" — is the single most important strategic frame. This tab answers it.

£18,560 / case
★ HIGHEST-MARGIN INDICATION · ALL-ON-X IMMEDIATE-LOAD 58% margin · £148K margin contribution from just 8 cases T90. Per surgical hour, All-on-X earns the practice £612 vs single-tooth's £820 throughput-adjusted — but lifts margin contribution by 11× per case.
1
The 80/20: Full-arch (18 cases) + All-on-X (8 cases) = 8.3% of total volume but 35% of total gross margin. Single-tooth at 71% of cases generates 31% of margin. The practice's growth lever is not "more implants" — it's more of the right implants.
2
All-on-X is the unlock. 58% margin per case (highest in the group), £18,560 contribution per case, immediate-load protocol means same-day patient walkout with provisional — the patient-experience differentiator. Mayfair runs 6 cases T90, Brighton runs 2, Leeds runs zero. The capability build at Leeds is the lever.
3
Zygomatic and Adjunct have margin compression. Both sit at 49% margin — not because case value is low (Zygomatic is £42K, the highest), but because direct cost (specialised fixtures, bone grafts, longer surgical time) eats into the margin. These are rescue indications, not engine indications. Volume should be steady but not growth-target.
4
The mix-shift math: every 1% of cases shifted from single-tooth to full-arch is worth ~£24K/qtr of incremental gross margin at the practice's current run-rate. Lifting Mayfair full-arch share 13→18% alone unlocks £82K/qtr without adding chair hours, payroll or marketing spend.

The full indication economics matrix

Five base indications + adjunct procedure premium · T90 actuals · cases, top-line, direct cost, gross margin £, margin %, contribution %, and £ per surgical hour. Adjunct procedures (bone graft, sinus lift) are overlays on base cases, not standalone case types. Implant case revenue subtotal excludes maintenance recall, CBCT consultations, and follow-up appointments (those add another £1.1M to reach the £3.35M group total).

Indication Cases T90 Avg case £ Top-line £ Direct cost £ Gross margin £ Margin % % total margin £/surg hr
Single-tooth implant 223 £3,180 £709K £341K £368K 52% 31% £820
Multi-tooth (2–4) 62 £8,400 £521K £250K £271K 52% 23% £680
Full-arch single jaw 18 £27,300 £491K £215K £276K 56% 23% £548
All-on-X immediate-load 8 £32,000 £256K £108K £148K ★ 58% 12% £612
Zygomatic rescue 2 £42,000 £84K £43K £41K 49% 3% £384
Adjunct procedure premium (overlay on 39 of the 313 base cases · bone graft / sinus lift) +39 £4,800 £187K £95K £92K 49% 8% £445
Implant case total (base + adjunct overlay) 313 base £6,585 £2.25M £1.05M £1.20M 53.3% 100% £642
Σ

THE CONCENTRATION INSIGHT

Full-arch + All-on-X combined: 26 cases (8.3% of volume) generating £424K of margin (35% of margin contribution). A 1-percentage-point lift in full-arch share is worth ~£24K/qtr. The practice already has the clinical capability and the lab supplier relationships — the constraint is upstream demand generation (Growth pillar lead-source quality) and downstream capability build at Leeds.

Indication mix × site — where each indication actually happens

Each site indexes toward a different case-mix. Mayfair is the premium-mix site (full-arch, All-on-X, zygomatic). Brighton is balanced. Leeds is single-tooth only — 98% of its case mix is single-tooth implant work, which structurally caps its margin-per-surgical-hour at £337 vs Mayfair's £610.

Indication Mayfair cases / margin Brighton cases / margin Leeds cases / margin Group margin
Single-tooth 90 · £149K 89 · £147K 44 · £73K £368K
Multi-tooth 32 · £140K 22 · £96K 8 · £35K £271K
Full-arch single jaw 12 · £184K 5 · £77K 1 · £15K £276K
All-on-X immediate 6 · £111K 2 · £37K 0 · — £148K
Zygomatic rescue 2 · £41K 0 · — 0 · — £41K
Adjunct overlay (on base cases above) 22 · £52K 14 · £33K 3 · £7K £92K
Site margin total (base + adjunct overlay) 142 cases · £677K (56%) 118 cases · £390K (33%) 53 cases · £130K (11%) £1.20M
Why this matters for the next 90 days

The mix shift is the highest-leverage move in the practice.

Hiring a coordinator costs £42K/yr. Switching a lab supplier saves £58K/yr. Reactivating 304 lapsed patients earns £73K/yr recurring. These are good moves — but they are all operational levers.

Mix shift is a strategic lever, not an operational one. Lifting Mayfair full-arch share from 13% to 18% delivers +£82K of incremental gross margin per quarter with no new payroll, no new chairs, no new marketing spend. Just better case selection by the treatment coordinators and case-acceptance training that pushes patients toward the right indication for their clinical situation (and for the practice's economics).

Think of it like a wine list. Every restaurant sells house wine. The margin difference between selling 100 bottles of house wine and selling 80 house + 20 reserve list is what separates a fine-dining restaurant from a chain. Halo's reserve list is the All-on-X book. Right now Mayfair runs it, Brighton dabbles, Leeds doesn't have one. That's the strategic question for FY27.